Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Glenn DeVore's avatar

Earthstar, wow! I found this piece incredibly intriguing, and admittedly, so rich that I had to return to it several times to grok each section and graphic slowly. Each pass seemed to reveal new layers I hadn’t seen before. The structure, language, and symbolism you’ve woven together feels quite deliberate, requiring a deep kind of attentive reading, perhaps fitting for the topic of focus.

Below, I’ve tried to summarize my key takeaways as best I could. I share them not as definitive interpretations, but as reflections-in-process. These are my attempts to track with your thought and see where it might overlap with my own current explorations. I’d be curious to know where I’ve landed close to your intention, and where I may have wandered a bit too far afield.

What I hear you saying is that focus (which is often treated as a skill or a fixed capacity) is more accurately a layered, relational, and emotionally mediated process. It's shaped not just by attention, but by how we relate to suffering, to control, and to the desire to bypass or mask difficult experiences. If this is the core of your message, all I can say is... Yes! I couldn't agree more.

You also offer a nuanced distinction between:

1. Natural focus (relaxed, emergent, unforced)

2. Masterful focus (intended, aware, cyclical)

3. Un-masterful focus (divided, reactive, control-seeking)

I was especially fascinated by the idea that many breakdowns in attention arise from emotional "binds" (where suffering is masked or avoided). And that these binds (like Wounded Pride, Obscurity, Repressed Spirit, etc.) subtly hijack focus and turn it toward self-protection rather than presence. Your language of “not ready / not set / no go” highlights something important for me: the inner posture of resistance that masquerades as busyness or distraction. I have often experienced the felt sense of that, and identify it as a loss of agency via automation or fragmentation.

Regarding your treatment of “masking,” as an unavoidable perceptual filter... I found this quite intriguing. What I read from that is that we don’t always see things as they are, but rather as we are able (or willing) to see them. In that sense, focus is always already interpretive, and masking becomes both a protection and a limitation. I’d love to know if I’m reading that as you intended.

Your emphasis on readiness to sense suffering as a prerequisite for depth, creativity, and grace echoes so much of what I’ve been thinking about in my own writings. Where I explore attention as the fragile access point to volition and meaningful participation, your framework seems to add a powerful interior dimension: that we must be willing to be with what is difficult in order to sustain authentic focus at all. I hope I have that right, as I love that framing.

I also deeply appreciate the way you challenge the cultural glorification of “rational, controlled” attention and instead point toward something more fluid and integrative. A focus that can move through layers (self, others, influence, reality) and doesn't fracture under emotional weight, but metabolizes it. That feels like a powerful invitation. I’d be curious to hear more about what you see as the practices (or inner postures) that might help sustain this integrative form of attention over time. I'm curious both at the individual level, and if you think there is a way to adjust this collectively (as a human species), especially with the current state of cultural and systemic attention landscapes.

Again, these are my reflections as a reader. I'm putting it through a lens of interpretation; however, I'm not sure if I hit the mark entirely. I’m grateful for the rigor and nuance you’ve brought to this, and I’d love to know where you feel this interpretation lands or misses.

Thank you again for creating this. It reminds me of a mandala. Something meant to be circled around and not decoded too quickly. I’ll keep circling. :)

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts